Apple could be compelled to allow rival app stores within the United Kingdom.
Apple could be required to permit competitors to operate separate application platforms on iPhones in the UK, following a decision from the competition regulator.
This represents a major shift to Apple's infamous "closed system" where apps can only be downloaded from its own official marketplace.
But the Competition and Markets Authority has designated both the tech giants as having "dominant market position" - indicating they have a lot of power over smartphone ecosystems.
Regulatory Findings
The regulator said the tech firms "may be limiting innovation and market rivalry".
But the regulator clarified it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the companies.
"The app economy generates 1.5% of the British economy and sustains around 400,000 jobs, which is why it's essential these sectors work well for enterprises," stated a top executive from the competition authority.
Approximately 90-100% of British smartphones run on Apple or Google's operating systems, creating what the regulator calls an "virtual monopoly".
Based on current data, 48.5% of British smartphone users use an Apple device - which runs Apple's iOS - with the vast majority of the rest using Google's Android.
The Company's Reaction
The regulatory probe focused on how prominent the companies' own applications are versus competitors - as well as their web applications and platform software.
It is unknown what changes the regulator will look to request, but earlier it published guidelines outlining possible actions it could take.
These comprise mandating it to be easier for people to switch between iOS and Android devices, and for both firms to rank apps "in a fair, objective and transparent manner" in their app stores.
The Cupertino company particularly may be required to permit alternative app stores on its devices, and let people to download programs straight from companies' websites.
This would follow comparable regulations in the EU, which previously imposed measures against Apple for anti-competitive behaviour.
The technology firm warned the United Kingdom could lose access to receiving updates - as has occurred in the EU - which the company attributes to strict rules.
For example, some AI capabilities which have been rolled out in other parts of the world are not accessible in the European market.
"We encounters intense rivalry in every sector where we do business, and we work tirelessly to create the finest offerings, services and customer interface," the organization said in a release.
"The UK's adoption of EU-style rules would weaken that, resulting in consumers with weaker privacy and security, slower availability to new features, and a divided, more complicated user journey."
The Search Giant's Standpoint
Google device owners can currently use alternative marketplaces - though critics say they are not as smooth as Google's own application marketplace.
The CMA's roadmap said Google may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps directly from websites, as well as "eliminate barriers" when using alternative app stores.
"We simply do not see the rationale for the current classification," a Google policy executive stated.
The representative said "the majority" of Google device owners use alternative app stores or download apps directly from a creator's site, and asserted there is a far greater range of apps available for Google device owners versus those on Apple devices.
"There are now twenty-four thousand Android phone models from 1,300 phone manufacturers globally, facing strong rivalry from iOS in the UK," the representative continued.
Android is an open-source operating system, which means creators can use and build on top of it for no cost.
Google contends this means it opens up competition.
But advocacy organizations said curbs on these firms' dominance in other countries "currently assist businesses to develop and providing customers more choice".
"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by limiting options for users and competition for businesses," stated a policy expert.