Skip to content
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Karl Nuttall's Blog

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Shape President Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Role in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be getting into the nation-building business.

In a remarkable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president declared that US military forces had successfully apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a team comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" involves is ambiguous, but the commitment marks an dramatic shift in direction for the president, laden with contradictions and daunting challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US attempts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now staking his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He pledged to enlist American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing funds for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have largely involved missiles and aircraft that reduce the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are notably distinct.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Domestic and International Reaction

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra may be tough for some of Trump's supporters to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who split from the president after accusing him of abandoning his core supporters, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's endless military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is justified because we are forced to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "firm and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, land and resources that are core to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will provoke broader questions in global politics, however, and affect American relations with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement expressing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced concern about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a success – with zero American casualties and limited damage to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, successful and powerful demonstrations of American power and competency in US history."

Now he is gambling his legacy on that success enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in chaos for decades while stabilising a region that is bound to be wary of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

Written by

Ryan Knight

A passionate student advocate and deal hunter, dedicated to helping peers save money and make the most of their academic journey.

Karl Nuttall's Blog

Type to search articles.